Home/Services by area/Bridgwater/Right to Manage in Bridgwater

Right to Manage in Bridgwater

1 published tribunal decision from in and around Bridgwater, with what each one actually decided.

Estate grounds maintained under a block management contract
Local authority
Somerset Council
Service
Right to Manage
County
Somerset
Published decisions
1 tribunal decision
From our Plymouth office
Approx. 84 miles

Right to Manage Cases Decided in and Around Bridgwater

Collingwood Court

HAV/40UC/LUS/2025/00027 May 2026

The building
A block of 16 flats forming part of an estate that also includes an 11-flat block. Before the right to manage was acquired the estate was managed as one entity, with the service charge split between the two blocks.
What was applied for
A determination of the accrued uncommitted service charges the former landlord had to hand over, under section 94(3) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
The figures
16 flats in this block, 11 in the other, split 58.77 and 41.23 per cent. Reserve fund 39,965.14 pounds. Determined sum 23,487.51 pounds. Disputed items 76,513.23 pounds.
Costs
A costs application against the freeholder was refused. Its failure to produce the accounts was objectively unreasonable and unexplained, but applying Willow Court the tribunal held this is not the clearest of cases, both sides having breached directions.

What Happened

The RTM company acquired the right to manage in December 2024 but said the freeholder had not produced accounts for 2022 to 2024, so it could not tell what should have transferred. The accounts were produced almost a year later and ran to three days before the acquisition date. The RTM company then sought to challenge more than 76,000 pounds of underlying service charge items.

What the Tribunal Held

23,487.51 pounds payable, being the block's 58.77 per cent share of the reserve fund shown in those accounts. The tribunal refused to reopen the underlying charges, holding that it cannot adjust the accrued uncommitted service charge to what it should be, following the Upper Tribunal in OM Ltd v New River Head, and that the RTM company cannot bring or take over a tenant's claim. On a disputed 9,000 pounds it said this is a matter the parties need to address between them.

What it means for a block here. A section 94 handover claim recovers only the uncommitted money the outgoing landlord actually held on the acquisition date. Historic overcharging is a separate section 27A claim and it belongs to the leaseholders, not to the RTM company.

What We Do About Right to Manage in Bridgwater

The Collingwood Court decision above is the kind of thing this work is for. Right to Manage in Bridgwater is part of a full management service, not a standalone product, and in practice it means:

  • Check a claim notice against the specific defects that have defeated claims near here, because most failures are procedural rather than substantive.

How This Works, in General

The law here is the same in Bridgwater as it is anywhere in England, and it is set out in full on our Right to Manage page rather than repeated on this one. What changes locally is above: the authority, the figures, and what the tribunal has actually done with cases nearby.

Other Services in Bridgwater

Everything else we do in the area is on the Bridgwater page, and the full matrix is at services by area.

Talk to Us About Your Building.