Home/Services by area/St Ives/Section 20 consultation and major works in St Ives

Section 20 Consultation and Major Works in St Ives

2 published tribunal decisions from in and around St Ives, with what each one actually decided.

Elm Court, a residential block managed by Plymouth Block Management
Local authority
Cornwall Council
Service
Section 20 consultation
County
Cornwall
Published decisions
2 tribunal decisions
From our Plymouth office
Approx. 79 miles

Section 20 Cases Decided in and Around St Ives

1 To 12 Salt Apartments, Belyars Lane

CHI/00HE/LDC/2022/0040 and 2024/002130 April 2025

The building
Said by the applicant to be a four-storey purpose-built block of twelve flats. The tribunal records this as the applicant's assertion rather than a finding.
What was applied for
Two applications for dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, the first for roof works and the second for additional works as the scope widened.
The figures
Twelve flats over four storeys. Applications in 2022 and 2024, decided 30 April 2025. A parallel section 27A application by the leaseholders was withdrawn as part of agreed terms. No cost of the works is stated anywhere in the decision.

What Happened

The roof had failed, causing water ingress into several flats. A warranty claim was submitted and, because of the insurer's delay, the freeholder proceeded and said leaseholders would be reimbursed if the insurer settled. A decision on the first application was later set aside on procedural grounds, which is why it was decided in 2025. The second application concerned failure of the waterproofing to one balcony affecting the flat below, for which no consultation had been undertaken at all, said to be urgent and able to be done using the scaffolding already erected.

What the Tribunal Held

Granted for both. Reply forms objecting had been submitted in 2024, but there was no response to the most recent directions and no leaseholder asserted prejudice. The tribunal found nothing different would be done or achieved by a full consultation except potential delay and potential problems, and that the respondents had not suffered prejudice. It stressed the limit: no determination was made on whether the costs of the works are reasonable or the service charges payable at all or in any given sum. It noted it has a very wide discretion to impose terms, including as to lessees' costs of legal advice, but imposed none.

What it means for a block here. Dispensation turns on whether leaseholders can show actual prejudice, not on whether consultation was skipped. It decides nothing about the cost.

1 To 18 Gallinas Point, Talland Road

HAV/00HE/LDC/2025/060811 March 2025

The building
A purpose-built block of 17 apartments over three storeys, eleven with two bedrooms and six with three, with a car park and gardens. Coastal, with steel beams in the structure and timber window frames required by local planning. The case title reads 1 to 18; the decision states 17 apartments and 17 leaseholder respondents.
What was applied for
Dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The figures
Seventeen apartments over three storeys. Application received 20 January 2025, works to begin February 2025, decided 11 March 2025. Fourteen days to serve the decision on all lessees. Section 20 threshold 250 pounds per lease.

What Happened

Water ingress traced to a failure during original construction had caused structural damage. The imported window brand could be sourced and fitted by only one contractor, frames had to be ordered for February delivery, and the leaseholders, who mainly let the flats as holiday accommodation, wanted the work outside the letting season. No leaseholder objected.

What the Tribunal Held

Granted on terms. Applying Daejan v Benson, the only question is relevant prejudice and the burden of showing it falls on the lessee. None asserted any, and the tribunal found nothing different would be done or achieved by a full consultation except potential delay and potential problems. Dispensation was made conditional on the landlord serving a copy of the decision on every lessee within 14 days, and the tribunal recorded that it made no determination on whether the costs of the works are reasonable or payable.

What it means for a block here. Dispensation is about prejudice, not price. An unopposed, genuinely urgent single-supplier job will get it, and the bill stays challengeable under section 27A afterwards.

What We Do About Section 20 Consultation in St Ives

The 1 to 12 Salt Apartments, Belyars Lane decision above is the kind of thing this work is for. Section 20 consultation in St Ives is part of a full management service, not a standalone product, and in practice it means:

  • Keep the consultation paperwork in the state the tribunal has expected to see it in locally, from the first notice onward.

How This Works, in General

The law here is the same in St Ives as it is anywhere in England, and it is set out in full on our major-works-section-20 page rather than repeated on this one. What changes locally is above: the authority, the figures, and what the tribunal has actually done with cases nearby.

Section 20 Consultation and Major Works Elsewhere

Everything else we do in the area is on the St Ives page, and the full matrix is at services by area.

Talk to Us About Your Building.